VT Childcare Policy: Make it more expensive and less accessible!

February 13, 2020

by Rob Roper

The House Education Committee is busy formulating the next steps in what is and has been a long-term, hostile takeover of a cottage childcare industry by a state-sanctioned, taxpayer funded monopoly. The ultimate goal of state childcare/early education policy is the full absorption of 0-5 year-olds into the public school system. This is why the committee now describes as the “backbone” of its current pre-k bill the requirement that in the near future, all early education providers must be licensed teachers. 

However, the entire premise of this concept is flawed – is, indeed counter-productive to the public interest — and is being forced by the committee’s leadership for the sole purpose of benefiting the NEA (teachers’ union).

The argument put forth by committee chair Kate Webb (D-Shelburne) is that the presence of licensed teachers results in better student outcomes. She and vice-chair Rep. Peter Conlon (D-Cornwall) repeat this talking point early and often. But, it’s not true. The VT Agency of Education’s own Pre-K study concluded:

… this body of research does not offer a consistent pattern of findings that would lend strong support to the assertion of a positive association between teacher qualifications and outcomes for PreK children…. [And,] the research has not documented a reliable association between teachers’ attainment of a bachelor’s degree and gains for children enrolled in such classrooms. (Page 52)

To repeat: Neither requiring a teacher’s license nor a bachelor’s degree for early ed providers shows any detectible impact on child outcomes. Yet, forcing this policy on providers would both increase the cost of child are and decrease accessibility – the very problems the system needs fixed!

The higher cost necessary to train licensed teachers would be reflected in the cost of childcare services, and since not all current providers would take the time and expense to get that license, there would be fewer qualified providers (which would again lead to even higher costs as decrease in supply increases scarcity, which increases cost….) All this — and this is the critical point — FOR NO REASON. There is no benefit to the child. Just the Union.

If the House Education Committee was working on behalf of kids, parents and their communities, their efforts would be aimed at removing barriers of entry into the marketplace for would-be childcare providers in order to increase accessibility, and removing unnecessary requirements and regulations that drive up costs. They are not doing this. They are, in fact, doing the opposite.

As the last major legislation spearheaded by the House Education Committee, the 2015 school consolidation law Act 46, proves over time to be an unmitigated disaster, the former House Education Committee chair, Dave Sharpe (D-Bristol), admitted in a recent op-ed that he and his fellow legislators were “hoodwinked” by false promises and premises presented by the public education lobby. His successor has not learned that lesson, and she and her committee are being hoodwinked yet again. And, again, Vermonters will pay a steep price for their incompetence.

Rob Roper is president of the Ethan Allen Institute. 

{ 1 comment… read it below or add one }

Rick Cowan February 15, 2020 at 6:47 pm

You are right on target with this analysis. Just when VT parents need affordable childcare, unnecessary and counterproductive regulation makes it more expensive.


Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post:

About Us

The Ethan Allen Institute is Vermont’s free-market public policy research and education organization. Founded in 1993, we are one of fifty-plus similar but independent state-level, public policy organizations around the country which exchange ideas and information through the State Policy Network.

Latest News

VT Left Wing Media Bias Unmasks Itself

July 24, 2020 By Rob Roper Dave Gram was a long time reporter for the Associated Press, is currently the host of what’s billed on WDEV as a...

Using Guns for Self Defense – 3 Recent Examples

July 24, 2020 By John McClaughry  The Heritage Foundation’s Daily Signal last week published eleven news stories about citizens using a firearm to stop a crime. Here are...

FERC ruling on solar subsidies could help Vermont ratepayers

July 21, 2020 By John McClaughry Last Thursday, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission finalized its updates to the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act (PURPA), in what the majority...

The Moderate Left’s Stand for Free Speech

July 17, 2020 By David Flemming Harper’s Magazine, a long-running monthly magazine of literature, politics, culture, finance, and the arts, is hardly what you would call a ‘politically...

Trump’s Regulatory Bill of Rights

July 16, 2020 by John McClaughry “President Trump [last May] issued an executive order entitled  ‘Regulatory Relief to Support Economic Recovery.’ The executive order includes a regulatory bill...