Vermont’s Sad Education Test Scores

by John McClaughry

Vermont Digger has done us another service by publishing a report entitled “Making the Grade?”. It presents the results of the tests used by Vermont and 14 other states to determine public school student proficiency in English and math in 3rd, 8th and 11th grades.

The Vermont Agency of Education  goes to great pains to emphasize that it’s not possible to compare the student proficiency levels of one state with another, for a lot of complicated reasons. So don’t leap to the unwarranted conclusion that public education is getting better results in state A over state B.

But now for the key finding. Quoting:

“Vermont is among a group of states that use the Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium test to measure student performance in English and math for students in 3rd through 8th grades and 11th grade…. Students who score proficient or above have mastered the material and are ready for the next grade….The average percentage of students achieving proficiency this year in Vermont was 48.4 percent, down from 50.92 percent last year.”

Did you get that? Half of our public school students finishing their respective school years are not ready to advance to the next grade –  measured by Vermont’s own proficiency standards, which may be too high, or too low – who’s to say?

For a billion and a half dollars every year, it seems to me that we ought to be getting better than fifty percent proficiency.

John McClaughry is vice president of the Ethan Allen Institute.

{ 3 comments… read them below or add one }

Clara Schoppe January 15, 2018 at 10:21 pm

All I can say is that I agree with you 100%.

Reply

Stuart Lindberg January 15, 2018 at 11:42 pm

“It is hard to imagine a more stupid or more dangerous way of making decisions than by putting those decisions in the hands of people who pay no price for being wrong. Know-it-alls in the school system do not lose one dime or one hour’s sleep if their bright ideas turn out to be all wrong, or even disastrous, for the child.” Thomas Sowell

Reply

Donna Goodhue January 16, 2018 at 2:14 am

The problem is that some of the special ed kids cannot read the questions. These students may be in 8th grade, but are doing 5th grade or lower work. It would be far better to test students at the beginning, middle, and end of the year. Is there improvement? In addition, the SBACs are on computers, using a split screen. Some students have difficulty testing that way.

Reply

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post:

About Us

The Ethan Allen Institute is Vermont’s free-market public policy research and education organization. Founded in 1993, we are one of fifty-plus similar but independent state-level, public policy organizations around the country which exchange ideas and information through the State Policy Network.
Read more...

Latest News

VT Left Wing Media Bias Unmasks Itself

July 24, 2020 By Rob Roper Dave Gram was a long time reporter for the Associated Press, is currently the host of what’s billed on WDEV as a...

Using Guns for Self Defense – 3 Recent Examples

July 24, 2020 By John McClaughry  The Heritage Foundation’s Daily Signal last week published eleven news stories about citizens using a firearm to stop a crime. Here are...

FERC ruling on solar subsidies could help Vermont ratepayers

July 21, 2020 By John McClaughry Last Thursday, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission finalized its updates to the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act (PURPA), in what the majority...

The Moderate Left’s Stand for Free Speech

July 17, 2020 By David Flemming Harper’s Magazine, a long-running monthly magazine of literature, politics, culture, finance, and the arts, is hardly what you would call a ‘politically...

Trump’s Regulatory Bill of Rights

July 16, 2020 by John McClaughry “President Trump [last May] issued an executive order entitled  ‘Regulatory Relief to Support Economic Recovery.’ The executive order includes a regulatory bill...

Video