Vermont Ranks “Below Average” for Fiscal Condition

by Rob Roper

The Mercatus Center released its annual study, “Ranking the States by Fiscal Condition.” Vermont landed in the “Below Average” category with an overall raking of 40.

According to the summary, “The study ranks each US state’s financial health based on short- and long-term debt and other key fiscal obligations, such as unfunded pensions and healthcare benefits.” The numbers used to make these calculations are from 2015.

The most major red flag for Vermont came in the “Service-Level Solvency” category, which determined the ability of a state to raise taxes in the face of a fiscal emergency, or, in other words, how much tax capacity is left. Here Vermont ranked 48th. We are taxed to the max.

Spelling more bad news, Vermont’s “Trust Fund Solvency” and “Long Run Solvency” rankings fell far enough to be mentioned in the “big movers” section. On the positive side, our “Budget Solvency” number improved significantly.

You can read the study summary HERE, the Vermont one pager HERE, and the full study HERE.

Rob Roper is president of the Ethan Allen Institute. 

 

 

{ 4 comments… read them below or add one }

Willem Post July 12, 2017 at 12:50 pm

Bob,

What about business-friendliness rating?

One of the reasons is public-private partnerships, such as Efficiency Vermont.

Here is my article on the subject.
https://www.windtaskforce.org/profiles/blogs/efficiency-vermont

Reply

Jim Bulmer July 16, 2017 at 10:23 pm

Just another black mark. What ever the topic, if it’s a positive one, Vermont always ranks toward the bottom. On the other hand if the catagory is negative, Vermont is always at or near the top. And the folks in Montpelier appear to be clueless or could care less.

Reply

Kerin Bostock July 22, 2017 at 5:08 pm

Thank you for sharing that link. I’ve lived in Rutland since ’03 and Vermont since ’93 and had no idea the seriousness. As of now, Governor Scott is adamant about the greenhouse gases in Vermont. A goal and policy for renewable energy set for 2018. How will this affect that fee in an already maxed tax Vermont.

Reply

Kerin Bostock July 22, 2017 at 4:50 pm

Maybe it’s about time the minority in this State is heard. Mostly, we want jobs and friendly activities to do. Friendly as in music, art, family activities, all ages, all walks of life, non structured, stuff.
Here in Rutland, our mall has loads of room! Sure could use a new clothing department and arcade! We don’t need another automobile sale.
We do need more public transportation.

Reply

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post:

About Us

The Ethan Allen Institute is Vermont’s free-market public policy research and education organization. Founded in 1993, we are one of fifty-plus similar but independent state-level, public policy organizations around the country which exchange ideas and information through the State Policy Network.
Read more...

Latest News

VT Left Wing Media Bias Unmasks Itself

July 24, 2020 By Rob Roper Dave Gram was a long time reporter for the Associated Press, is currently the host of what’s billed on WDEV as a...

Using Guns for Self Defense – 3 Recent Examples

July 24, 2020 By John McClaughry  The Heritage Foundation’s Daily Signal last week published eleven news stories about citizens using a firearm to stop a crime. Here are...

FERC ruling on solar subsidies could help Vermont ratepayers

July 21, 2020 By John McClaughry Last Thursday, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission finalized its updates to the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act (PURPA), in what the majority...

The Moderate Left’s Stand for Free Speech

July 17, 2020 By David Flemming Harper’s Magazine, a long-running monthly magazine of literature, politics, culture, finance, and the arts, is hardly what you would call a ‘politically...

Trump’s Regulatory Bill of Rights

July 16, 2020 by John McClaughry “President Trump [last May] issued an executive order entitled  ‘Regulatory Relief to Support Economic Recovery.’ The executive order includes a regulatory bill...

Video