Stop Digging: Escaping the Renewables Hole

April 25, 2019

By David Flemming

For decades, Vermont has been digging itself into a renewable energy hole. We have thrown away opportunities to provide inexpensive energy through natural gas and nuclear options, while adopting an “invest first, ask questions later” approach toward solar and wind energy. At long last, Vermont is showing signs of cutting off subsidies to renewable energy companies.

In January, Vermont’s Public Utility Commission bureaucracy denied Derby GLC Solar’s application to build a 500-kW solar net metering system because doing so would “jeopardize the reliable operation of the electrical grid” and would be against “the public good of the state.”

Now, solar developers are becoming anxious about future projects after it has become clear that utility companies in northeast Vermont do not have the capacity to handle more electricity from solar generated power. Northeast Vermont is capable of producing 450 MW, a large portion of which is from renewables. Demand for electricity in that part of northeast Vermont is only 35 MW, which means that 92% of generating capacity needs to be moved south at a high cost, or not produced at all.

A good deal of this capacity can be traced to wind energy, where wind developers in northeast Vermont are being penalized for producing too much electricity during certain times of the day. Such penalties cost the Vermont Electric Cooperative $653,000 in 2017.

This has done little to dissuade solar developers that they have the right to force even more solar energy on Vermonters. Nils Behn of Aegis Solar insists that public utilities, funded by Vermont ratepayers, should finance electric grid upgrades allowing companies like his to expand. He believes that “utilities (are) not properly planning for the modern grid.”

The lack of a “modern grid” is hardly the fault of our public utilities. A Department of Public Service report noted that Vermont’s grid was built to send centralized power out to homes and businesses.

Heedless of this fact, our government has authorized thousands of net metering generators. This is a sharp contrast to the few dozen large generators our electric grid was designed to support. At long last, Vermont’s Department of Public Service has begun telling solar developers like Aegis that they need to pay for the needed electric grid upgrades themselves if they want to continue building solar farms. While this stance is not the line in the sand that such companies need to see, it is better than giving them everything they want.

For too long, renewable companies have convinced Vermont regulators and legislators to saddle ratepayers with the the inherent risk of renewables, while they reap the benefits. After years of high electric bills, little progress reducing Vermont’s carbon emissions, and check after check being whisked away into the bank accounts of solar companies, the rejection of solar projects could be a sign that Vermont is ready to stop gambling with ratepayer money.

Last year, EAI reported on the potential for rolling blackouts during severe weather due to our dependency on solar and wind. While Vermont has done little to make this situation better, it would say a great deal if we can stop making it worse.

David Flemming is a policy analyst at the Ethan Allen Institute.



{ 4 comments… read them below or add one }

Shane Sweet April 26, 2019 at 9:05 pm

David. I think one could argue that it did not cost Vermont Electric Co-Op $653,000, rather the ratepayers?


Paul Kenyon April 26, 2019 at 9:39 pm

Hi David,
Since we’re talking about the efficacy of Vermont’s intermittent and variable renewables, specifically wind and PV solar, I’d like to know, since they are being installed to significantly reduce CO2 on the modern grids where they are installed, in this case, on Vermont’s grid, whether they are doing what they have been and are being installed to do, reduce significant CO2 on Vermont’s electricity grid. And I’m not talking about the conclusions of studies. I want to hear about (and see) the empirical data…as I should think you all would like to and as Vermonters would like to or should like to since we are all paying for the renewables and grid upgrades to handle the max power produced by the turbines and panel arrays. These generators have been being installed for decades on modern grids now. Due diligence requires the tests be done and the data provided. Just how much CO2 is avoided by Vermont’s renewables on Vermont’s grid?
If we don’t have that information, why don’t we? …And when will be be getting it? It’s time. We need to know. and we have the right to know.




William Hays April 27, 2019 at 1:35 am

Sorry, but I think that anyone who believes that an over-abundance of ‘Carbon Dioxide’ is is a “problem” needs to take some reality checks.


jim April 27, 2019 at 12:55 pm

Now let me get this straight. Am I to believe that the poor subsidized solar/wind folks want the grid expanded in northeast Vermont enlarged to handle all that carbon free electricity so they can generate all that stuff far beyond the need? Something doesn’t add up. Generate 450 to accommodate a 35 need? Am I missing something?


Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post:

About Us

The Ethan Allen Institute is Vermont’s free-market public policy research and education organization. Founded in 1993, we are one of fifty-plus similar but independent state-level, public policy organizations around the country which exchange ideas and information through the State Policy Network.

Latest News

VT Left Wing Media Bias Unmasks Itself

July 24, 2020 By Rob Roper Dave Gram was a long time reporter for the Associated Press, is currently the host of what’s billed on WDEV as a...

Using Guns for Self Defense – 3 Recent Examples

July 24, 2020 By John McClaughry  The Heritage Foundation’s Daily Signal last week published eleven news stories about citizens using a firearm to stop a crime. Here are...

FERC ruling on solar subsidies could help Vermont ratepayers

July 21, 2020 By John McClaughry Last Thursday, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission finalized its updates to the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act (PURPA), in what the majority...

The Moderate Left’s Stand for Free Speech

July 17, 2020 By David Flemming Harper’s Magazine, a long-running monthly magazine of literature, politics, culture, finance, and the arts, is hardly what you would call a ‘politically...

Trump’s Regulatory Bill of Rights

July 16, 2020 by John McClaughry “President Trump [last May] issued an executive order entitled  ‘Regulatory Relief to Support Economic Recovery.’ The executive order includes a regulatory bill...