Senior Citizens Would Get Hit Hardest by a $15 Minimum Wage

by Rob Roper

The $15 minimum wage is an increasingly hot topic in the election debates. Proponents have faith that artificially increasing the cost of labor will be a benefit to low-wage workers. Opponents can point to evidence that the $15 minimum wage will force employers to lay off employees, cut hours, or go out of business entirely, damaging the overall economy. But the group that will be hurt most by a $15 minimum is senior citizens. Here’s why….

According to UVM economist Art Woolf, a majority of Vermonters living below the poverty line do not work. That’s 31,000 non-working poor. Many of these are retired senior citizens living on a fixed income. Of course, if you’re not working you will receive zero benefit from an artificial increase in the wage rate. However, you would be harmed by the very real inflation resulting from the policy.

Businesses would have to pass on the higher cost of labor to their customers in the form of higher prices for goods and services. Senior citizens living on fixed incomes would, therefore, have to pay more for things like food, nursing care, household help, etc. and so on, with no boost in income to help cover those costs. In other words, fixed incomes would not stretch as far under a $15 minimum wage.

Senator Richard Westman (R-Lamoille) raised an example from his own life experience in that he would no longer be able to afford in-home nursing care for his aging parent if the $15 minimum wage became law. He also noted that Lamoille Home Health and Hospice would have to raise or charge an extra $80,000 to cover wage increases for their visiting nurses, and that money will have to come from someone, most likely in the form of higher bills to the people in need of the service.

Vermont is the second oldest state in the union, which would mean implementing this experiment here would come with a disproportionately high level of pain.

Rob Roper is president of the Ethan Allen Institute.

{ 5 comments… read them below or add one }

Jim Toher September 19, 2018 at 7:04 pm

What about my daughter who went on and received a 4 year early childhood education degree, who want to stay in Vermont, and is getting just over $15/hour and the state provided medical insurance. Will her pay increase?


Rob September 19, 2018 at 7:18 pm

More than likely, since she is already making over $15 an hour and there will be a need to use limited resources to raise the wages of less qualified workers currently making less then $15 an hour, your daughter will not get a raise.


Deanne September 22, 2018 at 2:27 am

Thank you for trying to help people get this concept, Rob. Will the people who need to understand this read it, listen to it? Will it make any impression? I don’t see how people can be so short-sighted to think that a policy such as this won’t have a ripple effect. Wages must adjust to accommodate such a change. A doctor or lawyer (or whoever) who is making, say, $200,000 per year and paying office help $12/hour, isn’t going to just accept the cut in wage value and “eat” the loss of being forced to pay $15/hour. He is going to raise his rate or he has essentially accepted a pay cut. If anyone thinks about this for even five minutes – thinking through the repercussions – they would have to conclude it is a faulty idea. Maybe that’s the problem – thinking has become a rare activity…


Ed February 10, 2020 at 8:16 pm

This really concerns me as a retired SS recipient.
Do all the people pushing this increase think that the grocery store owners and other retail business are NOT going to pass the increased cost of doing business on to the consumers in the form of price hikes? Of course they will. The cost of nearly everything from groceries to electricity will go up. Yes my SS benefit will it go up but I do not see it going up enough to keep pace with the rising cost of living this minimum wage hike will bring. Likewise are the increased wages for those now earning less than $15 hr. going to make them any better off after everybody else raises the cost of produced goods and services?
I started working @ 13 for 35 cents an hour. I remember when I started making $1.00 an hour working in a cotton gin. Yes I finally worked myself up to a job/project superintendent in industrial construction and made a good wages. I busted my butt working hard and working smart, totally a company man for whomever I was working for and in the end got rewarded for my effort and the long hard hours.
I understand that not every person or every job has the opportunity to advance as I
did and I am not knocking those that do not have that skill or opportunity but I just do not want to get knocked back down the ladder.


William Hays September 22, 2018 at 5:45 pm

When I first joined the Mount Mansfield Professional Ski Patrol in 1968, I made $2.90/hour. It was sufficient for food, rent, gas, and, most importantly, beer. Not a “kingly” lifestyle, but we (32 full-timers) got by, somehow. Long hours – ~63/week, 7-days per. No overtime.) Great, fun times!


Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post:

About Us

The Ethan Allen Institute is Vermont’s free-market public policy research and education organization. Founded in 1993, we are one of fifty-plus similar but independent state-level, public policy organizations around the country which exchange ideas and information through the State Policy Network.

Latest News

VT Left Wing Media Bias Unmasks Itself

July 24, 2020 By Rob Roper Dave Gram was a long time reporter for the Associated Press, is currently the host of what’s billed on WDEV as a...

Using Guns for Self Defense – 3 Recent Examples

July 24, 2020 By John McClaughry  The Heritage Foundation’s Daily Signal last week published eleven news stories about citizens using a firearm to stop a crime. Here are...

FERC ruling on solar subsidies could help Vermont ratepayers

July 21, 2020 By John McClaughry Last Thursday, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission finalized its updates to the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act (PURPA), in what the majority...

The Moderate Left’s Stand for Free Speech

July 17, 2020 By David Flemming Harper’s Magazine, a long-running monthly magazine of literature, politics, culture, finance, and the arts, is hardly what you would call a ‘politically...

Trump’s Regulatory Bill of Rights

July 16, 2020 by John McClaughry “President Trump [last May] issued an executive order entitled  ‘Regulatory Relief to Support Economic Recovery.’ The executive order includes a regulatory bill...