Roll Call! Senate Votes to Force Towns to Fund Pre-K Programs (19-9), 2014

Roll Call Rotator

.
SENATE VOTES TO FORCE TOWNS TO FUND PRE-K PROGRAMS
PASSED
in the State Senate on May 2, 2014 by a vote of
19-9 

.
Purpose: To continue the expansion of the state’s role in pre-kindergarten. Specifically, this bill mandates that publicly funded prekindergarten for 10 hours per week/35 weeks annually be made available at taxpayer expense to any “prekindergarten child” whom the parent or guardian wishes to enroll in an available, prequalified program.  (Read the Bill)
.
Analysis: Those voting YES on H.270 voted for an estimated $10 million increase in education costs over the next five years, which will be reflected in increased property taxes, and to override local control regarding the decision of whether or not to offer publicly funded pre-kindergarten in the first place.
.
The key language in the legislation states, “If a parent or guardian chooses to enroll a prekindergarten child in an available, prequalified program, then, pursuant to the parent or guardian‘s choice, the school district of residence shall [emphasis added]: (A) pay tuition…” whether the towns and taxpayers in the district want to or not.
.
When Act 62 (Vermont’s Public Pre-K Law) came into being in 2007, it came with some important assurances, the first being: “(1) a reaffirmation that prekindergarten education remains voluntary. School districts are not required to provide prekindergarten education [emphasis added], and children are not required to attend. (Guide for Implementing  Prekindergarten  Education in Accordance with Vermont’s Act 62, 2009) Without these assurances, the original pre-k bill would likely not have passed. Now they are being jettisoned.
.
The $10 million price tag comes with the goal of enrolling 60% of eligible three, four, and five year olds into publicly funded pre-k programs. Currently, 36% of eligible children are enrolled.
.
Given the steady march of pre-k legislation over the past 6 years in Vermont (First, codifying the concept of universal, publicly-funded pre-k into law. Then, removing the cost containment caps on enrollment numbers. Now, changing it from a voluntary to a mandatory program at the district level…), it is not without reason to expect this program will, over time, be expanded from a 10 hour-per-week program to a 40 hour-per-week program administered and funded entirely through the public school monopoly system, at which point it will be extremely expensive.
.
Senate Journal, Friday, May 2, 2014. “…the bill was read the third time and passed in concurrence with proposal of amendment?, on a roll call, Yeas 19, Nays 9.” (Read the Journal, p. 1225-1226)


How They Voted

(Click on Your Senator’s Name to Send an Email)

Timothy Ashe (D/P-Chittenden) – YES
Claire Ayer (D-Addison) – YES
Philip Baruth (D-Chittenden) – YES
Joseph Benning (R-Caledonia) – NO
Christopher Bray (D-Addison) – ABSENT
John Campbell (D-Windsor) – YES
Donald Collins (D-Franklin) – ABSENT
Ann Cummings (D-Washington) – YES
William Doyle (R-Washington) – YES
Margaret Flory (R-Rutland) – NO
Eldred French (D-Rutland) – YES
Peter Galbraith (D-Windham) – YES
Robert Hartwell (D-Bennington) – YES
M. Jane Kitchel (D-Caledonia) – NO
Virginia Lyons (D-Chittenden) – YES
Mark MacDonald (D-Orange) – YES
Richard Mazza (D-Chittenden-Grand Isle) – NO
Norman McAllister (R-Franklin) – NO
Richard McCormack (D-Windsor) – YES
Kevin Mullin (R-Rutland) – YES
Alice Nitka (D-Windsor District) – YES
Anthony Pollina (P/D/W-Washington) – YES
John Rodgers (D-Essex-Orleans) – NO
Richard Sears (D-Bennington) – NO
Diane Snelling (R-Chittenden) – NO
Robert Starr (D-Essex-Orleans) – NO
Michael Sirotkin (D-Chittenden) – YES
Richard Westman (R-Lamoille) – YES
Jeanette White (D-Windham) – YES
David Zuckerman (P-Chittenden) – YES

Not yet signed up? Join the EAI email list today.

 

{ 0 comments… add one now }

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post:

About Us

The Ethan Allen Institute is Vermont’s free-market public policy research and education organization. Founded in 1993, we are one of fifty-plus similar but independent state-level, public policy organizations around the country which exchange ideas and information through the State Policy Network.
Read more...

Latest News

VT Left Wing Media Bias Unmasks Itself

July 24, 2020 By Rob Roper Dave Gram was a long time reporter for the Associated Press, is currently the host of what’s billed on WDEV as a...

Using Guns for Self Defense – 3 Recent Examples

July 24, 2020 By John McClaughry  The Heritage Foundation’s Daily Signal last week published eleven news stories about citizens using a firearm to stop a crime. Here are...

FERC ruling on solar subsidies could help Vermont ratepayers

July 21, 2020 By John McClaughry Last Thursday, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission finalized its updates to the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act (PURPA), in what the majority...

The Moderate Left’s Stand for Free Speech

July 17, 2020 By David Flemming Harper’s Magazine, a long-running monthly magazine of literature, politics, culture, finance, and the arts, is hardly what you would call a ‘politically...

Trump’s Regulatory Bill of Rights

July 16, 2020 by John McClaughry “President Trump [last May] issued an executive order entitled  ‘Regulatory Relief to Support Economic Recovery.’ The executive order includes a regulatory bill...

Video