Roll Call! Senate Votes Against Giving Towns “Substantial Deference” When Siting Renewable Power Facilities (10-19), 2015

Roll Call Graphic.
FAILED
in the State Senate on May 15, 2015 by a vote of
10-19 

.

Purpose: To give “substantial deference” to local municipal conservation planning when considering the siting of a renewable energy generating facility.
.
Analysis: The full amendment reads: “With respect to a wind electric generation facility, substantial deference shall be given to the land conservation measures contained in the plan of any affected municipality or in the regional plan. In this subdivision (C), “substantial deference” means that a land conservation measure shall be applied in accordance with its terms unless there is a clear and convincing demonstration that it lacks a rational basis or that other factors affecting the general good of the State outweigh application of the measure.
.
Those voting YES gave deference to local community planning in regard to siting renewable energy facilities, as well as giving weight to the values of “conservation” when conservation comes into conflict with the expansion of renewable energy generation.
.
Those voting NO supported giving towns no official power when determining siting of renewable energy projects, and to prioritize renewable energy development over conservation.
.
Senate Journal, Friday, May 15, 2015. “Senator Campbell having demanded the yeas and nays, they were taken and are as follows: [Yeas 10, Nays 19].” (Read the Journal, p. 1904-1905)
.


How They Voted

(Click on Your Senator’s Name to Send an Email)

Timothy Ashe (D/P-Chittenden) – NO
Claire Ayer (D-Addison) – NO
Becca Balint (D-Windham) –  NO
Philip Baruth (D-Chittenden) – NO
Joseph Benning (R-Caledonia) – YES
Christopher Bray (D-Addison) – NO
John Campbell (D-Windsor) – YES
Brian Campion (D-Bennington) – NO
Brian Collamore (R-Rutland) – YES
Ann Cummings (D-Washington) – NO
Dustin Degree (R-Franklin) – YES
William Doyle (R-Washington) – NO
Margaret Flory (R-Rutland) – YES
M. Jane Kitchel (D-Caledonia) – YES
Virginia Lyons (D-Chittenden) – NO
Mark MacDonald (D-Orange) – NO
Richard Mazza (D-Chittenden-Grand Isle) – NO
Norman McAllister (R-Franklin) – ABSENT
Richard McCormack (D-Windsor) – NO
Kevin Mullin (R-Rutland) – YES
Alice Nitka (D-Windsor District) – YES
Anthony Pollina (P/D/W-Washington) – NO
John Rodgers (D-Essex-Orleans) – YES
Richard Sears (D-Bennington) – NO
Diane Snelling (R-Chittenden) – NO
Robert Starr (D-Essex-Orleans) – YES
Michael Sirotkin (D-Chittenden) – NO
Richard Westman (R-Lamoille) – NO
Jeanette White (D-Windham) – NO
David Zuckerman (P-Chittenden) – NO

Not yet signed up? Join the EAI email list today.

{ 0 comments… add one now }

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post:

About Us

The Ethan Allen Institute is Vermont’s free-market public policy research and education organization. Founded in 1993, we are one of fifty-plus similar but independent state-level, public policy organizations around the country which exchange ideas and information through the State Policy Network.
Read more...

Latest News

VT Left Wing Media Bias Unmasks Itself

July 24, 2020 By Rob Roper Dave Gram was a long time reporter for the Associated Press, is currently the host of what’s billed on WDEV as a...

Using Guns for Self Defense – 3 Recent Examples

July 24, 2020 By John McClaughry  The Heritage Foundation’s Daily Signal last week published eleven news stories about citizens using a firearm to stop a crime. Here are...

FERC ruling on solar subsidies could help Vermont ratepayers

July 21, 2020 By John McClaughry Last Thursday, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission finalized its updates to the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act (PURPA), in what the majority...

The Moderate Left’s Stand for Free Speech

July 17, 2020 By David Flemming Harper’s Magazine, a long-running monthly magazine of literature, politics, culture, finance, and the arts, is hardly what you would call a ‘politically...

Trump’s Regulatory Bill of Rights

July 16, 2020 by John McClaughry “President Trump [last May] issued an executive order entitled  ‘Regulatory Relief to Support Economic Recovery.’ The executive order includes a regulatory bill...

Video