Minimum Wage Challenge: Don’t Forget the Benefits!

March 26, 2018

by Rob Roper

As the Vermont legislature debates raising the state minimum wage to $15 an hour, a handful of lawmakers is taking what’s being called the minimum wage challenge. The idea is to live on what a minimum wage earner makes in a week, which, according to the rules put out by Rights & Democracy, is:

Take home income (after avg. housing & taxes subtracted) – Add 1 of the 4 below into your budget line based on your life circumstances*
     1 — Married person living alone – $161.00
     2 — Married person sharing housing cost w/spouse – $274.50
     3 — Single person living alone- $147.00
     4 — Single person sharing housing cost w/partner or roommate – $260.50

While trying to understand the real challenges of making ends meet on limited income is a worthwhile endeavor (suggest reading Nickel and Dimed by Barbara Ehrenreich), this game misses the mark.

According to the Vermont Paycheck Calculator, the take home pay of someone earning $10.50 an hour for a 40 hour week is $374 after taxes. Those game figures of $147 to $275 reflect a reduction in housing costs of what my back-of-the-napkin calculation appears to be $850 a month. Fair enough. But what it does not reflect is the benefits someone earning $20,800 per year (minimum wage/40 hours per week) collects in Vermont.

As the chart below illustrates, a single parent earning minimum wage has access to resources of roughly $45,000 a year, including benefits such as state and federal earned income tax credits, food stamps (3 Squares), and childcare subsidies. This is an amount roughly equivalent to the after-tax resources of someone who earns a salary of $52,000 a year. Legislators need to explain why it is fair for someone earning $50,000 a year to be forced to subsidize through taxes the higher standard of living, at least in terms of access to resources, of someone earning $25,000. Significantly higher when you subtract childcare costs from the $50,000 earner’s after tax income, which is not reflected in this chart.

Benefits Cliff Chart

Also looking at the chart you will see that someone earning $32,500, about what someone earning $15 an hour would make in a year, is starting to slide over the “benefits cliff”: the point where added income equals a reduction in overall access to resources. The worker who gets a wage bump from $15 to $18 or $19 an hour as a result of the minimum wage increase is really screwed!

This “benefits cliff” is what causes some workers to refuse promotion or increased salary for fear of loss of benefits. But, in doing so, folks that make this decision are relegating themselves to being part of a permanent underclass. Barring a lottery win, choosing benefits over income means poverty forever.

This dynamic is the “wage challenge” our legislators should be looking to fix.

Rob Roper is president of the Ethan Allen Institute

{ 2 comments… read them below or add one }

Doug Ricnmond March 31, 2018 at 2:19 am

Working as I did with hundreds of small businesses, I heard MANY stories of a new employee determinted to get his family off welfare. Works hard, gets raises. Eventually he loses one welfare beniefit after another. Finally he can’t get that subsidized 4 bedroom apt. Makes ‘too much money’. Forced to quit by the system.

Heard that for 25 years.


Allan Morrie March 31, 2018 at 7:49 pm

When the minimum wage is increased over the next few yars, I doubt that the businesses will increase the wages of their employees.
I work for a multi billion corporation, and the factory that I work at clears 43 million per year. We are not paid much more than $15.50 per hour. So I’m wondering how the minimum wage increase is going to benefit those of us that already mach just over $15 per hour?
The corporations work their employees to the maximum and pay the least amount that they can get away with. Te employees are afraid to unionize for fear of being fired.
The company that I work for can afford to pay their employees twice as much as they do now.
In the 1950’s and1960’s, a family could be supported by one income, and the spouse could stay home and raise their childen to be responsible citizens.


Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post:

About Us

The Ethan Allen Institute is Vermont’s free-market public policy research and education organization. Founded in 1993, we are one of fifty-plus similar but independent state-level, public policy organizations around the country which exchange ideas and information through the State Policy Network.

Latest News

VT Left Wing Media Bias Unmasks Itself

July 24, 2020 By Rob Roper Dave Gram was a long time reporter for the Associated Press, is currently the host of what’s billed on WDEV as a...

Using Guns for Self Defense – 3 Recent Examples

July 24, 2020 By John McClaughry  The Heritage Foundation’s Daily Signal last week published eleven news stories about citizens using a firearm to stop a crime. Here are...

FERC ruling on solar subsidies could help Vermont ratepayers

July 21, 2020 By John McClaughry Last Thursday, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission finalized its updates to the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act (PURPA), in what the majority...

The Moderate Left’s Stand for Free Speech

July 17, 2020 By David Flemming Harper’s Magazine, a long-running monthly magazine of literature, politics, culture, finance, and the arts, is hardly what you would call a ‘politically...

Trump’s Regulatory Bill of Rights

July 16, 2020 by John McClaughry “President Trump [last May] issued an executive order entitled  ‘Regulatory Relief to Support Economic Recovery.’ The executive order includes a regulatory bill...