Commentary: Carbon Tax Will Hurt Towns, Schools, and Property Taxpayers (October, 2016)

by Wendy WiltonWendy Rotator Card

A carbon tax on gasoline, diesel, home heating fuel and propane will negatively impact Vermont’s already struggling economy. In just a few years from passage the impact is expected to be an additional $0.88 per gallon on gasoline, $1.02 on diesel and home heating fuel, and $0.58 per gallon of propane.

Increasing the cost of fuel will also likely increase property taxes as the state has not exempted municipalities or school districts from paying most fuel taxes. Municipalities and school districts operate vehicles and equipment such as school buses, police cars, fire trucks, plow trucks and excavators. These vehicles use significant amounts of fuel and energy costs are a large part of municipal and school budgets.

If the state carbon tax proposed last year were in fully implemented in fiscal year 2016 the City of Rutland would have budgeted about $805,000 for gasoline, diesel, fuel oil and propane, a 48% increase over the $543,000 budget. This represents $0.03 on the municipal tax rate or $45 per year tax increase for the average home. That cost would be about the same as the bond cost of a new City swimming pool.

The Rutland School district spent $106,000 on fuel oil, and $88,000 on gasoline and diesel. With the added tax these expenditures would also increase to 48% increase, the difference representing salary and benefits for approximately one classroom teacher.

If a carbon tax were imposed it would mean hard budgetary choices for towns and schools just a few years. This tax is very regressive, will be very harmful for working Vermonters, and will add more burdens through the town and school budgets.  Increasing the cost of fuel will also mean our fuel assistance programs will help fewer needy Vermonters. There is no guarantee that tax revenues collected form such a tax won’t be used to shore up the state’s budget woes.

Nationally, progressives are pushing a multistate cap and trade bill that will have similar effects. Gubernatorial candidate Sue Minter supports such a plan, whereas Phil Scott has said he will veto a carbon tax.

Wendy Wilton is treasurer of Rutland City and a member of the Ethan Allen Institute board of directors. 

{ 3 comments… read them below or add one }

Jim Bulmer November 1, 2016 at 5:14 pm

On November 8, we can put a cork in the carbon tax bottle once and for all, VOTE, VOTE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Reply

Peg C November 4, 2016 at 4:39 pm

Sounds like the underpinings of “smart growth” being brought
through a back door, but this too is for our own good as the socialists would
have us believe…..

Reply

Andrew Tarantino November 4, 2016 at 6:20 pm

Well said Wendy, Thank you! Now Sue Tax More Minter, is telling VT biz Magazine she does not support the carbon tax. a bit of Flip Flop. I wonder if she will flip or flop on her plan to tax services, like haircuts, and lawn mowing and self storage and plumbing and electric and car repair, and moving and anything else! We need Phil Scott for Vermont, he will being honesty, affordability, accountability and fairness along with something that has been missing for along time in Montpelier COMMON SENSE! Vote person not Party!

Reply

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post:

About Us

The Ethan Allen Institute is Vermont’s free-market public policy research and education organization. Founded in 1993, we are one of fifty-plus similar but independent state-level, public policy organizations around the country which exchange ideas and information through the State Policy Network.
Read more...

Latest News

VT Left Wing Media Bias Unmasks Itself

July 24, 2020 By Rob Roper Dave Gram was a long time reporter for the Associated Press, is currently the host of what’s billed on WDEV as a...

Using Guns for Self Defense – 3 Recent Examples

July 24, 2020 By John McClaughry  The Heritage Foundation’s Daily Signal last week published eleven news stories about citizens using a firearm to stop a crime. Here are...

FERC ruling on solar subsidies could help Vermont ratepayers

July 21, 2020 By John McClaughry Last Thursday, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission finalized its updates to the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act (PURPA), in what the majority...

The Moderate Left’s Stand for Free Speech

July 17, 2020 By David Flemming Harper’s Magazine, a long-running monthly magazine of literature, politics, culture, finance, and the arts, is hardly what you would call a ‘politically...

Trump’s Regulatory Bill of Rights

July 16, 2020 by John McClaughry “President Trump [last May] issued an executive order entitled  ‘Regulatory Relief to Support Economic Recovery.’ The executive order includes a regulatory bill...

Video