Commentary: Bernie’s Teachable Moment on the $15 Minimum Wage (July, 2019)

by Rob RoperRob Roper

Bernie Sanders’ rhetoric on the $15 minimum wage – rhetoric echoed by many politicians here in Vermont – just suffered a violent collision with economic reality.

For those who may have missed the story, Sanders pays his field staff minimum salaries of $36,000 a year, which would amount to slightly over $15 an hour for a forty hour work week. However, political campaigns are 24/7 operations, and staff members are putting in sixty hours a week or more, thus reducing their hourly wage to far less than $15 an hour with no overtime. The staff is crying foul.

Sanders is, of course, a leading advocate for a national $15 minimum wage and has made considerable political hay badmouthing employers like Walmart, McDonald’s, and Amazon with soundbites like, “The greed of companies like Walmart at the expense of working people will end.” Well, now Bernie is the one being accused by his own employees of being the greedy skin flint, forcing them to live on “starvation wages,” unable to make ends meet. According to The Hill, at least one individual has filed an unfair labor practices complaint against Sanders’ campaign.

So, what is the Sanders campaign to do?

Campaign manager Faiz Shakir pointed out that, the budget already being set, to raise the salaries for field workers would necessitate firing some of them. Sanders himself said the solution would be to cut back workers’ hours and cap them at forty-two per week.

This is an example of what the Congressional Budget Office warned would happen if a national $15 minimum wage went into effect: as many as 3.7 million low-wage jobs would disappear. Similarly, Vermont’s Joint Fiscal Office concluded that if the policy were adopted statewide, it would result in a net annual long term “disemployment” rate of 2250 jobs from 2028-2050.

The reality Sanders faces is that a business (and a campaign is in many ways like a business) can’t spend money it doesn’t have, nor it can’t make money appear out of thin air. If you pay some workers more, you have to pay some workers less – or nothing. You can increase the hourly wage by reducing total hours worked, but that’s not a financial benefit to the worker (though they would have more leisure time), and it would be detrimental to the main mission of the campaign, which is to win an election. The campaign could spend less on advertising, events, direct mail, etc., but that also would be detrimental to the primary mission of the campaign.

Victory is what donors, the campaign’s customers, are investing in. If you’re not running a high-quality, competitive operation – or, in other words, you are not putting out as good a product as the other candidates in the race — donors will go elsewhere and you’ll have even less money to spend on salaries and benefits. Of course, if the campaign fails then everybody will be out of a job.

Sanders probably feels misused by these ungrateful employees, and it’s hard not to sympathize with him on this score. After all, he is genuinely trying to do his best. $36,000 a year for a political field worker isn’t chicken feed. Plus, he’s giving them full health benefits. He encouraged them to unionize. (In fact, the salary and benefits package now under formal complaint was collectively bargained by the United Food & Commercial Workers Local 400. Now the workers forced to live under the union agreement think they got screwed.) And, he is providing them with a valuable work experience/resume builder on an exciting, national presidential campaign. In return, these campaign workers publicly humiliated the very entity that is the genesis of all their incomes. Shrewd.

Many of the excuses Sanders floats are the same as those he scoffed at when it was him leveling the charges of unfair labor practices. His campaign says, “We know our campaign offers wages and benefits competitive with other campaigns, as is shown by the latest fundraising reports.” True. Of course, McDonald’s offers wages and benefits competitive with other fast food restaurants. That didn’t keep Sanders from attacking.

One wonders if Bernie will have more empathy in the future toward businesses who, like he, are doing the best they can for their employees with the resources they have, even if that doesn’t live up to “progressive” ideological standards. More importantly, will Bernie’s followers in the Vermont legislature learn from this debacle and drop thoughts of passing a $15 minimum wage in 2020?

Rob Roper is president of the Ethan Allen Institute.

{ 2 comments… read them below or add one }

Deanne August 2, 2019 at 10:16 pm

Proverbs 26:27 Whoever digs a pit falls into it, and whoever rolls a stone, it turns back on him.

…. but I have a feeling he will find a way to weasel out of this and convince his admirers he is justified in what he is doing. Just a feeling…

Also… here is a case where both sides are wrong. Nothing and no one is holding those workers there. They willingly and voluntarily agreed to do the job for the wages offered and they are free to leave (unless they signed something to the contrary, which I doubt) at any time. If they can find a better position for better pay, they should take it. Complaining about something you chose, but staying in the situation, is not helping them but is only good for helping demonstrate to the public Bernie’s hypocrisy.

On the other hand, Bernie is talking out of both sides of his mouth – trying to force others to live by his ideas, which he won’t even implement until he has to. It’s kind of like someone saying that they don’t believe in slavery, but keeping their slaves until they are required by law to free them. Sorry, I don’t believe it.

But it is interesting to observe…


Pat Finnie August 18, 2019 at 1:37 pm

Forgive me please, but for Beanie (not a typo, that’s what I call him) to turn this into a “teachable” moment, wouldn’t he have to admit he’s full of … air, yup hot air. That’s what I was going to say hot air.


Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post:

About Us

The Ethan Allen Institute is Vermont’s free-market public policy research and education organization. Founded in 1993, we are one of fifty-plus similar but independent state-level, public policy organizations around the country which exchange ideas and information through the State Policy Network.

Latest News

VT Left Wing Media Bias Unmasks Itself

July 24, 2020 By Rob Roper Dave Gram was a long time reporter for the Associated Press, is currently the host of what’s billed on WDEV as a...

Using Guns for Self Defense – 3 Recent Examples

July 24, 2020 By John McClaughry  The Heritage Foundation’s Daily Signal last week published eleven news stories about citizens using a firearm to stop a crime. Here are...

FERC ruling on solar subsidies could help Vermont ratepayers

July 21, 2020 By John McClaughry Last Thursday, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission finalized its updates to the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act (PURPA), in what the majority...

The Moderate Left’s Stand for Free Speech

July 17, 2020 By David Flemming Harper’s Magazine, a long-running monthly magazine of literature, politics, culture, finance, and the arts, is hardly what you would call a ‘politically...

Trump’s Regulatory Bill of Rights

July 16, 2020 by John McClaughry “President Trump [last May] issued an executive order entitled  ‘Regulatory Relief to Support Economic Recovery.’ The executive order includes a regulatory bill...