6-26-15 – Bernie’s Misleading Claim Highlights Need to Re-Define Poverty Statistics

Posted by Rob Roper

The website FactCheck.Org recently took Bernie Sanders to task for claiming that 1 in 5 seniors “live on an average income of $7,600 a year.” Not true.

Without getting into the weeds about how that number was incorrect (and low) in and of itself, Fact Check pointed out that Bernie’s calculation does not count things like food stamps, housing assistance, LIHEAP heating assistance, Medicare or Medicaid reimbursements, proceeds from reverse mortgages, withdrawals from savings, insurance proceeds, gifts, capital gains (such as profit from sale of a personal residence), or lump-sum insurance payments or inheritances.

These folks, while perhaps still in tight financial shape, are not “living on” just $7,600 a year.

Which gets to an important part about poverty statistics and how they can be confusing. The U.S. calculates poverty based on money income before taxes and does not include benefits such as public housing, Medicaid, and food stamps, etc., or capital gains. So when the government or a politician tells us X percentage of Americans are “living in poverty,” in many cases they really aren’t. They are living middle class lives, albeit subsidized by the taxpayer.

It would, therefore, make a whole lot more sense to calculate poverty rates AFTER taxes and taking into account government redistribution programs.

A few years ago, Gary Alexander, Secretary of Public Welfare, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, calculated, “the single mom is better off earnings gross income of $29,000 with $57,327 in net income & benefits than to earn gross income of $69,000 with net income [after taxes] and benefits of $57,045.” Using Alexander’s example, in both cases, when it comes to calculating where someone lies on the poverty/middle class/wealthy scale, aren’t the $57,327/$57,045 numbers more accurate and revealing than the $29,000/$69,000?

This is how we should calculate whether someone is living in poverty or not. And, as such, perhaps we need a new classification: “Dependent.”

{ 0 comments… add one now }

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post:

About Us

The Ethan Allen Institute is Vermont’s free-market public policy research and education organization. Founded in 1993, we are one of fifty-plus similar but independent state-level, public policy organizations around the country which exchange ideas and information through the State Policy Network.
Read more...

Latest News

VT Left Wing Media Bias Unmasks Itself

July 24, 2020 By Rob Roper Dave Gram was a long time reporter for the Associated Press, is currently the host of what’s billed on WDEV as a...

Using Guns for Self Defense – 3 Recent Examples

July 24, 2020 By John McClaughry  The Heritage Foundation’s Daily Signal last week published eleven news stories about citizens using a firearm to stop a crime. Here are...

FERC ruling on solar subsidies could help Vermont ratepayers

July 21, 2020 By John McClaughry Last Thursday, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission finalized its updates to the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act (PURPA), in what the majority...

The Moderate Left’s Stand for Free Speech

July 17, 2020 By David Flemming Harper’s Magazine, a long-running monthly magazine of literature, politics, culture, finance, and the arts, is hardly what you would call a ‘politically...

Trump’s Regulatory Bill of Rights

July 16, 2020 by John McClaughry “President Trump [last May] issued an executive order entitled  ‘Regulatory Relief to Support Economic Recovery.’ The executive order includes a regulatory bill...

Video